Autocar Xspotter 2012
Vehicle Details: Recalls, Investigations, Service Bulletins
Use the box here to look up VINs from AUTOCAR as well as other manufacturers
-
Where is the 2012 AUTOCAR Xspotter produced?
- The 2012 AUTOCAR Xspotter is produced in Hagerstown Indiana, United States (usa).
-
Are there recalls for the 2012 AUTOCAR Xspotter?
- There are 3 recall(s) for the 2012 AUTOCAR Xspotter, additional information is below.
Recall 237530 [USA]: The unexpected release of the parking brake may allow the vehicle to rollaway, increasing the risk of a crash.
Recall 101681 [USA]: The improper operation of the sensor could induce elevated exhaust temperatures or flames from the exhaust pipe, increasing the risk of a vehicle fire or burn injury to a person near the exhaust pipe.
Recall 2012433 [Canada]: Wheels
To ensure accuracy and for your safety, it is recommended to do a free VIN recall check here or here [USA] - UK - Canada.
Bulletins are notices put out by manufacturers in conjunction with the NHTSA to notify the public of manufacturing issues or changes.
- Pro32 VAG - BACK OVER PREVENTION:SOFTWARE: Software installation instructions.
- SP 8-600-004 - EQUIPMENT:APPLIANCE:AIR CONDITIONER: Tsb work instructions to enhance blower motor speed on my 2010-2018 xspotter hvac system.
- SP-2-201-002 - ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING:COOLING SYSTEM:FAN: Autocar: information pertaining to a defect in thickness of material for certain fan shrouds may result in premature failure of shroud and would need to be replaced. Model xspotter. No model years. *pe
Delayed throttle response investigation # PE13011
This investigation was opened based on a fleet complaint alleging delayed throttle response which could potentially lead to extended stopping distances and/or increase the risk of a crash.Autocar responded to odis information request (ir) letter and provided test data including its fmvss 124 validation data.Odi reviewed autocars testing procedures and results with nhtsas office of vehicle safety compliance and office of rule making.The test procedure was acceptable as were the results.In an effort to further quantify the safety risk, odi surveyed nine fleets operating the same subject vehicles.Of the eight reporting fleets, only one expressed concerns similar to the fleet submitting the voq.Of all the fleets contacted, none had experienced a crash where the throttle delay was a contributing factor.Autocar provided a modified direct wire throttle to the initial fleet as a customer satisfaction campaign.This configuration resulted in an improved throttle response.In light of the low rate of delayed throttle response on the subject vehicles and autocars actions to improve the throttle response on the complaint vehicles, further use of agency resources does not appear to be warranted.The closing of this investigation does not constitute a finding by nhtsa that no safety-related defect exists.The agency reserves the right to take further action if warranted by the circumstances.The odi complaint cited above can be reviewed at: http://www-odi.Nhtsa.Dot.Gov/owners/searchnhtsaid using the following (odi) number: 10471829