Ricon K2010

Vehicle Details: Recalls, Investigations

Below you will find all available information on the RICON K2010.

ManufacturerKnown WMI(s)Fuel Type
RICON
RICON VIN Decoder

Use the box here to look up VINs from RICON as well as other manufacturers

#

Sub-models: - K2010-l -

Frequently Asked Questions
  • Are there recalls for the RICON K2010?
     - There are 7 recall(s) for the RICON K2010, additional information is below.
NHTSA Mandated Recalls
  • Recall 103522 [USA]: If the cable does not clear the wheel chair lift it may contact the power lug and if it does not have a nonconductive cover, or it has an improperly installed non-conductive cover, then a short circuit may occur that could result in a fire.

  • Recall 93486 [USA]: The cable may contact the power lug at the base of the wheel chair lift causing a short circuit that could result in a fire.

  • Recall 66997 [USA]: When the platform overruns the vehicle floor level and stops at an angle from 15-20 degrees, it is possible for a person in a wheelchair to tip over and for someone standing on the platform to fall, possibly resulting in injuries.

  • Recall 67748 [USA]: If the buckle is not fully latched, the lift can operate and a wheelchair may not be adequately protected against movement, possibly resulting in injury to the wheelchair occupant.

  • Recall 90398 [USA]: A lift occupant can be injured should the lift begin to stow unintentionally.

  • Recall 90466 [USA]: The user of the lift could be injured should the lift move unintentionally.

  • Recall 37493 [USA]: The wheelchair occupant will feel his/her wheelchair moving upward causing occupant to begin to tilt backward.

To ensure accuracy and for your safety, it is recommended to do a free VIN recall check here or here [USA] - UK - Canada.

Known Recall Investigations
  • Ricon/threshold warning/anti-stow investigation # EQ08011

    On 11/2/2007 ricon filed two noncompliance reports for their s series and k series platform style wheelchair lifts.Ricon identified certain wheelchair lifts (07e-095), manufactured between 4/1/2005 and 10/9/07, as failing to comply with the threshold warning system requirements of fmvss 403 s7.4.These lifts threshold warning system might not activate if a mobility aid (such as a wheelchair) moves toward a certain point in the threshold area.Should this system not operate properly, the wheelchair lift occupant might fall from the lift and suffer injury.Ricon submitted another noncompliance report (07e-097) for the s series & k series wheelchair lifts, encompassing some of the lifts from the above recall.Manufactured between 4/1/05 and 6/6/2006, certain lifts may fail to comply with their anti-stow interlock requirements of fmvss 403 s7.The pressure sensing switch that detects weight on the platform might not be adjusted to the proper sensitivity level.These lifts might begin to tilt toward the vehicle and begin to stow while an occupant is still on the lift.This may cause the occupant to slide or fall from the lift and suffer injury.On september 8, 2008 rmd mailed letters to 183 companies, which constituted the entirety of ricons customer list for the recalled products, advising them of ricons recall and requesting that they file their required reports.Rmd followed that mailing with a2nd ir letteron 11/17/2008.As a result of those mailings, a total of 53 companies decided to submit a noncompliance report and conduct a safety recall for the vehicles they manufactured or altered as "new" vehicles with the installation of these recalled wheelchair lifts.A total of 95 recalls (many companies filing a report for each recall) were received as a result of these initial mailings.In the course of the eq, it was learned that one of ricons customers, vantage mobility international (vmi), actually distributed its wheelchair lifts to hundreds of other companies.Vmi had notified many of its customers of the ricon recalls, but none of those companies had notified nhtsa of any new vehicles manufactured or altered with this equipment.On june 17-19, 2009 rmd mailed 502 addional ir letters.These letters contained a set of questions asking if the recalled lifts were installed into new or used vehicles and also asked if vin information was recorded by the company.In the event the companies would not be able to notify their customers, rmd wanted to know if vin information could be transmitted back to ricon for proper customer notifications based on state registration records.A total of 17 companies filed 31 noncompliance reports as a result of the june 2009 mailing.A total of 126 safety recalls were conducted as a result of this equipment query.A total of 258 companies failed to respond to rmds ir letters and they will be referred to the office of the chief counsel for further action.Totals and the eq mailing spreadsheet are attached below and available in the document repository.This eq is closed.

  • Wheelchair lift arm fractures investigation # PE08022

    The office of defects investigation has received one fleet complaint identifying 33 alleged failures on the subject wheelchair lifts. The alleged failures have occurred on school buses in two alaskan school districts.These allegations describe cracks developing on the lifts vertical support arms at a pinned joint where a horizontal arm interfaces with the vertical arm.The lifts are used to raise wheelchairs from the street level to allow entry into the school bus.These bent arms may cause three possible safety concerns.First, the bent arms may prevent an inboard bridge from laying flat and thus prevent a wheel chair from loading the lift in an emergency.Second, bent arms may cause the anti-stow interlock switch to become out of adjustment possibly allowing the lift to start moving to the stowed position while a chair is still on the platform.Third, the bent arms may also create a situation where the requirements of fmvss 403 - s6.10.2.3 are no longer met.Ricon feels that the bent arms are not a safety concern because the operator will see that the lift is damaged before a passenger is loaded onto the bus.If the driver sees that the lift is damaged, they should not load a passenger that would then need to be unloaded in an emergency.This pe has been upgraded to an engineering analysis (ea) to determine what causes the arms to fail, if the arms can fail while the lift is in a stowed position, and if a passenger can be loaded while the lift is in a failed condition.

© dot.report 2024

Use of this information constitutes acceptance for use in an AS IS condition. There are NO warranties, implied or otherwise, with regard to this information or its use. Any use of this information is at the user's risk. It is the responsibility of user to evaluate the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any information, opinion, advice or other content. EACH USER WILL BE SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY consequences of his or her direct or indirect use of this web site. ALL WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND ARE EXPRESSLY DISCLAIMED. This site will NOT BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT or any other kind of loss.