1987 Chevrolet G30 Van 2wdChevrolet G30 Van 2wd 1987

Vehicle Details: Recalls, Fuel Economy, Emissions, Investigations

Chevrolet Logo

Below you will find all available information on the 1987 Chevrolet G30 Van 2wd.
The vehicle is described as a Rear-Wheel Drive Vans .

ManufacturerKnown WMI(s)Fuel Type
ChevroletRegular
City MPGHighway MPGCO2 emissions
14 MPG17 MPG592.46 g/mile
Chevrolet VIN Decoder

Use the box here to look up VINs from Chevrolet as well as other manufacturers

#
Frequently Asked Questions
  • What is the MPG of a 1987 Chevrolet G30 Van 2wd?
     - The 1987 Chevrolet G30 Van 2wd has an EPA estimated city efficiency of 14 MPG and an estimated highway efficiency of 17 MPG.
  • What is the fuse box diagram for the 1987 Chevrolet G30 Van 2wd?
     - Fuse box diagrams for the 1987 Chevrolet G30 Van 2wd can be found here
  • What is the annual fuel cost for the 1987 Chevrolet G30 Van 2wd?
     - EPA estimated annual fuel cost for the 1987 Chevrolet G30 Van 2wd is $3600.
  • Are there recalls for the 1987 Chevrolet G30 Van 2wd?
     - There are 3 recall(s) for the 1987 Chevrolet G30 Van 2wd, additional information is below.
NHTSA Mandated Recalls
  • Recall 89565 [USA]: This condition may cause inadequate sealing and loss of engine oil, possibly resulting in a fire.

  • Recall 59622 [USA]: This condition may cause an inadequate seal at the connection, potentially leading to a fuel leak. in the presence of an ignition source, a fire could occur.

  • Recall 26422 [USA]: Fuel could leak from the pipe during refueling orturning and spill fuel in excess of amount prescribed by fmvss 301.

To ensure accuracy and for your safety, it is recommended to do a free VIN recall check here or here [USA] - UK - Canada.

NHTSA Submitted Mechanical & Emissions Details
  • Automatic 4-spd Rear-Wheel Drive G30 Van 2wd

    Description Data
    Engine cylinders6
    Engine displacement in liters4.3
    Engine descriptor; see fueleconomy.gov details(FFS)
    TransmissionAutomatic 4-spd
    You save/spend over 5 years compared to an average car ($). savings are positive; a greater amount spent yields a negative number. for dual fuel vehicles, this is the cost savings for gasoline-8250
    Description Data
    Annual petroleum consumption in barrels for fuel type 119.834
    City mpg for fuel type 1,14
    Combined mpg for fuel type 1,15
    Engine cylinders6
    Engine displacement in liters4.3
    Drive axle typeRear-Wheel Drive
    EPA model type index4822
    Engine descriptor; see fueleconomy.gov details(FFS)
    Annual fuel cost for fuel type 1 ($)3600
    Fuel type with fuel type 1 and fuel type 2 (if applicable)Regular
    Fuel type 1. for single fuel vehicles, this will be the only fuel. for dual fuel vehicles, this will be the conventional fuel.Regular Gasoline
    Highway mpg for fuel type 1,17
    Vehicle record id3867
    Model name (carline)G30 Van 2wd
    Has my mpg data; see yourmpgvehicle and yourmpgdrivervehicleY
    If true, this vehicle operates on a blend of gasoline and electricity in charge depleting modefalse
    TransmissionAutomatic 4-spd
    Unadjusted city mpg for fuel type 117.0
    Unadjusted highway mpg for fuel type 124.0
    EPA vehicle size classVans
    You save/spend over 5 years compared to an average car ($). savings are positive; a greater amount spent yields a negative number. for dual fuel vehicles, this is the cost savings for gasoline-8250
    Date the vehicle record was created (iso 8601 format)Tue Jan 01 00:00:00 EST 2013
    Date the vehicle record was last modified (iso 8601 format)Tue Jan 01 00:00:00 EST 2013
Known Recall Investigations
  • High temp & fuel exp investigation # EA88016

    There is no summary currently available

  • Lower control arm investigation # EA88007

    Summary of information from manufacturer:manufacturer is in receipt ofone complaint and five field reports.Product report analysis states "thelower control arm from waggoner corporation appears to have a small radiusat the transition of the side wall to the ball stud nose.Current stampingsource, s.K.D., also has a small radius in the same area.S.K.D. Haschanged the trim to increase the radius to 1 inch and provide additionalstrength in the ball stud area."analysis:failure data indicates the left control arm and diesel engineapplication are over represented.All known failures have occurred at lowspeeds, or have been located as a result of an increase in the frequency ofmaintenance inspections.Ball joint separation could result in collapse offront wheel suspension and loss of vehicle control.Action: ir to gm sent 11/19/87 contact fleet owners.===

  • Lower control arm failure investigation # PE87056

    Summary of information from manufacturer:manufacturer is in receipt ofone complaint and five field reports.Product report analysis states "thelower control arm from waggoner corporation appears to have a small radiusat the transition of the side wall to the ball stud nose.Current stampingsource, s.K.D., also has a small radius in the same area.S.K.D. Haschanged the trim to increase the radius to 1 inch and provide additionalstrength in the ball stud area."analysis:data indicates 38 of 40 failures involve the left control arm,39 of the vehicles are powered by the diesel engine.All failures haveoccurred at low speeds, or have been located during increased frequencymaintenance inspections.Separation of the ball joint from the controlarm could cause one side of the front wheel suspension to collapse,possibly resulting in loss of vehicle control.Proposed action:upgrade this pe to an ea.===

  • Exhaust system heat investigation # PE87043

    Summary of information from manufacturer:analysis of the 65 complaintsforwarded by gm on this issue reveals that 15 of the complaints may besafety related.Complaints identifying the problem as a "red hot exhaustsystem" or muffler failure were not counted.Gm also included numerouscomplaints pertaining to fuel expulsion in the motor home chassis.Theywere not counted since that problem is already under investigation.Concerning brush fires resulting from the high exhaust temperatures, gmstates"our field experience, as evidenced by the low number of reportspertaining to the exhaust temperature, indicates to us that our customersare observing the precautions contained in our owners manual and areexercising the necessary precautions."analysis:the alleged defect originates with the generation of heat in theexhaust system.Higher exhaust temperatures are occurring as a result ofstringent environmental protection agency (epa) requirements which wentinto effect in 1985 for vehicles with a gvw in excess of 8,500 lbs.Thehigher exhaust temperatures can lead to excessive underbody temperatureswhich may result in fuel system pressurization and a higher potential forthe expulsion of liquid fuel upon removal of the fuel tank filler cap.Inaddition, other side effects such as smoldering items in pick up beds,burnt tires and mudflaps have been reported.Proposed action:upgrade this pe to an ea.Since some models are alreadybeing investigated, and complaint data is sparse on other models, the newea should be directed only to vehicle models "c" and "k" which utilize theheavy duty (vehicles with a gvw in excess of 8,500 lbs) emission system.===

© dot.report 2024

Use of this information constitutes acceptance for use in an AS IS condition. There are NO warranties, implied or otherwise, with regard to this information or its use. Any use of this information is at the user's risk. It is the responsibility of user to evaluate the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any information, opinion, advice or other content. EACH USER WILL BE SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY consequences of his or her direct or indirect use of this web site. ALL WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND ARE EXPRESSLY DISCLAIMED. This site will NOT BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT or any other kind of loss.