2007 Mercury MilanMercury Milan 2007

Vehicle Details: Recalls, Fuel Economy, Emissions, Investigations, Consumer Complaints, Decoded VIN Details, Service Bulletins

Mercury Logo

Below you will find all available information on the 2007 Mercury Milan.
The vehicle is described as a Front-Wheel Drive Midsize Cars 4-door sedan, hardtop.

ManufacturerKnown WMI(s)Fuel Type
MercuryRegular
City MPGHighway MPGCO2 emissions
17 - 20 MPG24 - 29 MPG386.39 - 467.73 g/mile
Mercury VIN Decoder

Use the box here to look up VINs from Mercury as well as other manufacturers

#

Sub-models: - Milan Awd -

Frequently Asked Questions
  • What is the MPG of a 2007 Mercury Milan?
     - The 2007 Mercury Milan has an EPA estimated city efficiency of 17 - 20 MPG and an estimated highway efficiency of 24 - 29 MPG.
  • What is the fuse box diagram for the 2007 Mercury Milan?
     - Fuse box diagrams for the 2007 Mercury Milan can be found here
  • What is the annual fuel cost for the 2007 Mercury Milan?
     - EPA estimated annual fuel cost for the 2007 Mercury Milan is $2350.
  • Where is the 2007 Mercury Milan produced?
     - The 2007 Mercury Milan is produced in Hermosillo, Mexico.
  • Are there recalls for the 2007 Mercury Milan?
     - There are 8 recall(s) for the 2007 Mercury Milan, additional information is below.
  • How much horsepower does the 2007 Mercury Milan have?
     - The 2007 Mercury Milan has 210 horsepower.
NHTSA Mandated Recalls
  • Recall 229425 [USA]: An inflator explosion may result in sharp metal fragments striking the driver or other occupants, resulting in serious injury or death.

  • Recall 150540 [USA]: If the valves do not properly close, additional brake pedal travel may be required to stop the vehicle, increasing the risk of a crash.

  • Recall 120680 [USA]: An inflator rupture may result in metal fragments striking the vehicle occupants resulting in serious injury or death.

  • Recall 104387 [USA]: The floor mat could shift such that it could interfere with the accelerator pedal, preventing its return to an idle position, which could result in unintended vehicle speeds, increasing the risk of a crash.

  • Recall 2021029 [Canada]: Airbag

  • Recall 2019665 [Canada]: Brakes

  • Recall 2019005 [Canada]: Airbag

  • Recall 2016347 [Canada]: Airbag

To ensure accuracy and for your safety, it is recommended to do a free VIN recall check here or here [USA] - UK - Canada.

NHTSA Submitted Mechanical & Emissions Details
  • Automatic 5-spd Front-Wheel Drive Milan

    Description Data
    Engine cylinders4
    Engine displacement in liters2.3
    TransmissionAutomatic 5-spd
    You save/spend over 5 years compared to an average car ($). savings are positive; a greater amount spent yields a negative number. for dual fuel vehicles, this is the cost savings for gasoline-2000
    Transmission descriptor; for information see the fueleconomy.gov detailsCLKUP
    Description Data
    Annual petroleum consumption in barrels for fuel type 112.9352
    City mpg for fuel type 1,20
    Combined mpg for fuel type 1,23
    Engine cylinders4
    Engine displacement in liters2.3
    Drive axle typeFront-Wheel Drive
    Annual fuel cost for fuel type 1 ($)2350
    Fuel type with fuel type 1 and fuel type 2 (if applicable)Regular
    Fuel type 1. for single fuel vehicles, this will be the only fuel. for dual fuel vehicles, this will be the conventional fuel.Regular Gasoline
    Highway mpg for fuel type 1,29
    Vehicle record id23585
    4 door luggage volume (cubic feet)16
    Model name (carline)Milan
    Has my mpg data; see yourmpgvehicle and yourmpgdrivervehicleY
    If true, this vehicle operates on a blend of gasoline and electricity in charge depleting modefalse
    4-door passenger volume (cubic feet)100
    TransmissionAutomatic 5-spd
    Unadjusted city mpg for fuel type 125.3912
    Unadjusted highway mpg for fuel type 139.9703
    EPA vehicle size classMidsize Cars
    You save/spend over 5 years compared to an average car ($). savings are positive; a greater amount spent yields a negative number. for dual fuel vehicles, this is the cost savings for gasoline-2000
    Transmission descriptor; for information see the fueleconomy.gov detailsCLKUP
    Date the vehicle record was created (iso 8601 format)Tue Jan 01 00:00:00 EST 2013
    Date the vehicle record was last modified (iso 8601 format)Tue Jan 01 00:00:00 EST 2013
  • Manual 5-spd Front-Wheel Drive Milan

    Description Data
    Engine cylinders4
    Engine displacement in liters2.3
    TransmissionManual 5-spd
    You save/spend over 5 years compared to an average car ($). savings are positive; a greater amount spent yields a negative number. for dual fuel vehicles, this is the cost savings for gasoline-2000
    Description Data
    Annual petroleum consumption in barrels for fuel type 112.9352
    City mpg for fuel type 1,20
    Combined mpg for fuel type 1,23
    Engine cylinders4
    Engine displacement in liters2.3
    Drive axle typeFront-Wheel Drive
    Annual fuel cost for fuel type 1 ($)2350
    Fuel type with fuel type 1 and fuel type 2 (if applicable)Regular
    Fuel type 1. for single fuel vehicles, this will be the only fuel. for dual fuel vehicles, this will be the conventional fuel.Regular Gasoline
    Highway mpg for fuel type 1,29
    Vehicle record id23586
    4 door luggage volume (cubic feet)16
    Model name (carline)Milan
    Has my mpg data; see yourmpgvehicle and yourmpgdrivervehicleY
    If true, this vehicle operates on a blend of gasoline and electricity in charge depleting modefalse
    4-door passenger volume (cubic feet)100
    TransmissionManual 5-spd
    Unadjusted city mpg for fuel type 125.8
    Unadjusted highway mpg for fuel type 140.3
    EPA vehicle size classMidsize Cars
    You save/spend over 5 years compared to an average car ($). savings are positive; a greater amount spent yields a negative number. for dual fuel vehicles, this is the cost savings for gasoline-2000
    Date the vehicle record was created (iso 8601 format)Tue Jan 01 00:00:00 EST 2013
    Date the vehicle record was last modified (iso 8601 format)Tue Jan 01 00:00:00 EST 2013
  • Automatic 6-spd Front-Wheel Drive Milan

    Description Data
    Engine cylinders6
    Engine displacement in liters3.0
    TransmissionAutomatic 6-spd
    You save/spend over 5 years compared to an average car ($). savings are positive; a greater amount spent yields a negative number. for dual fuel vehicles, this is the cost savings for gasoline-3000
    Transmission descriptor; for information see the fueleconomy.gov detailsCLKUP
    Description Data
    Annual petroleum consumption in barrels for fuel type 114.1671
    City mpg for fuel type 1,18
    Combined mpg for fuel type 1,21
    Engine cylinders6
    Engine displacement in liters3.0
    Drive axle typeFront-Wheel Drive
    Annual fuel cost for fuel type 1 ($)2550
    Fuel type with fuel type 1 and fuel type 2 (if applicable)Regular
    Fuel type 1. for single fuel vehicles, this will be the only fuel. for dual fuel vehicles, this will be the conventional fuel.Regular Gasoline
    Highway mpg for fuel type 1,26
    Vehicle record id23587
    4 door luggage volume (cubic feet)16
    Model name (carline)Milan
    Has my mpg data; see yourmpgvehicle and yourmpgdrivervehicleN
    If true, this vehicle operates on a blend of gasoline and electricity in charge depleting modefalse
    4-door passenger volume (cubic feet)100
    TransmissionAutomatic 6-spd
    Unadjusted city mpg for fuel type 122.3
    Unadjusted highway mpg for fuel type 136.1
    EPA vehicle size classMidsize Cars
    You save/spend over 5 years compared to an average car ($). savings are positive; a greater amount spent yields a negative number. for dual fuel vehicles, this is the cost savings for gasoline-3000
    Transmission descriptor; for information see the fueleconomy.gov detailsCLKUP
    Date the vehicle record was created (iso 8601 format)Tue Jan 01 00:00:00 EST 2013
    Date the vehicle record was last modified (iso 8601 format)Tue Jan 01 00:00:00 EST 2013
  • Automatic 6-spd 4-Wheel or All-Wheel Drive Milan Awd

    Description Data
    Engine cylinders6
    Engine displacement in liters3.0
    TransmissionAutomatic 6-spd
    You save/spend over 5 years compared to an average car ($). savings are positive; a greater amount spent yields a negative number. for dual fuel vehicles, this is the cost savings for gasoline-4500
    Transmission descriptor; for information see the fueleconomy.gov detailsCLKUP
    Description Data
    Annual petroleum consumption in barrels for fuel type 115.6584
    City mpg for fuel type 1,17
    Combined mpg for fuel type 1,19
    Engine cylinders6
    Engine displacement in liters3.0
    Drive axle type4-Wheel or All-Wheel Drive
    Annual fuel cost for fuel type 1 ($)2850
    Fuel type with fuel type 1 and fuel type 2 (if applicable)Regular
    Fuel type 1. for single fuel vehicles, this will be the only fuel. for dual fuel vehicles, this will be the conventional fuel.Regular Gasoline
    Highway mpg for fuel type 1,24
    Vehicle record id23588
    Model name (carline)Milan Awd
    Has my mpg data; see yourmpgvehicle and yourmpgdrivervehicleN
    If true, this vehicle operates on a blend of gasoline and electricity in charge depleting modefalse
    TransmissionAutomatic 6-spd
    Unadjusted city mpg for fuel type 120.7
    Unadjusted highway mpg for fuel type 133.9
    EPA vehicle size classMidsize Cars
    You save/spend over 5 years compared to an average car ($). savings are positive; a greater amount spent yields a negative number. for dual fuel vehicles, this is the cost savings for gasoline-4500
    Transmission descriptor; for information see the fueleconomy.gov detailsCLKUP
    Date the vehicle record was created (iso 8601 format)Tue Jan 01 00:00:00 EST 2013
    Date the vehicle record was last modified (iso 8601 format)Tue Jan 01 00:00:00 EST 2013
Bulletins

Bulletins are notices put out by manufacturers in conjunction with the NHTSA to notify the public of manufacturing issues or changes.

  • SSM 52243 - ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING: When performing any transmission fluid change or topoff involving motorcrafta? Premium atf, mercona? V has replaced all versions of motorcrafta? Premium atf and can be used going forward. Mixing motorcrafta? Premium atf and mercona? V in th
  • 22B05 S1 - AIR BAGS: Certain 2005-2014 mustang, 2005-2006 gt, 2004-2011 ranger, 2006-2012 fusion and mkz/zephyr, 2006-2011 milan, and 2007-2010 edge & mkx vehicles driver & passenger airbag module quality control inspection reason for this supplement ??A?A?
  • 22B05 - AIR BAGS: Certain 2005-2014 mustang, 2005-2006 gt, 2004-2011 ranger, 2006-2012 fusion & mkz/zephyr, 2006-2011 milan, and 2007-2010 edge & mkx vehicles driver & passenger airbag module quality control inspection: ford motor company has determined that
  • 21N11-S3 - SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC: Certain 2006-2010 model year fusion/milan/mkz/zephyr vehicles equipped with anti-lock brake systems dot 3 brake fluid and anti-lock brake system function in some of the affected vehicles, customers may return to the dealer with complaints
  • 17B23-S1 - AIR BAGS: Certain 2006-2008 model year fusion and milan, 2006 zephyr, 2007-2008 mkz and 2007-2008 edge, mkx and ranger vehicles - driver airbag inflator replacement
  • 17B23-S1 - AIR BAGS: Certain 2006-2008 model year fusion and milan, 2006 zephyr, 2007-2008 mkz and 2007-2008 edge, mkx and ranger vehicles - driver airbag inflator replacement
  • SSM 46085 - ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING:EXHAUST SYSTEM: The powertrain control/emissions diagnosis (pc/ed) manual has been revised for diagnosing electronic throttle bodies (etbs). The etc_act and etc_dsd pids should not used to diagnose possible etb concerns. The ids has a limited refresh rate
  • TSB-13-4-17 - POWER TRAIN:AUTOMATIC TRANSMISSION:CONTROL MODULE (TCM, PCM): Ford/lincoln/mercury: some vehicles, with diagnostic codes (dtcs) P0351, P0352, P0353, P0354, P0355, may experience a malfunction indicator lamp in the powertrain control module (pcm) and one or more coil on plug(s) damage. Models 2006-08
  • TSB-12-8-1 - ENGINE (PWS): Ford/lincoln/mercury: may have sludge buildup in throttle body leading to less airflow or engine idling rpm fluctuation and hard starts or battery disconnect or dead battery after keep alive memory (kam) clear. Models 2003-05 thunderbird
  • 072315 - POWER TRAIN:AUTOMATIC TRANSMISSION:CONTROL MODULE (TCM, PCM): Mil on--dtc P2100 and P2110 in memory - 3.0l engine. *nj
  • 0773 - SEATS: Front seat manual lumbar inoperative. *kb
  • 0723 - POWER TRAIN:AUTOMATIC TRANSMISSION: Various driveability/transmission symptoms - pcm/tcm calibration updates 3.0l - aisin f21 auto trans. *kb
  • 0629 - UNKNOWN OR OTHER: Certain 2007 vehicles built between july 1, 2006 - september 2, 2006 are not included in the oasis. Vehicles affected have owner guides with power distribution box fusing information that does not match the vehicle. *kb
  • 0713 - STEERING:HYDRAULIC POWER ASSIST:HOSE, PIPING, AND CONNECTIONS: Power steering fluid leaks from steering rack and pump attachment joints. *kb updated 2/27/08. *nj
  • 06166 - ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING:ENGINE: Possible engine damage - install special service tools prior to removing crankshaft pulley bolt. *kb
  • 19355 - POWER TRAIN:AUTOMATIC TRANSMISSION: Driveability concerns and/or dtcP0340 - inspect crankshaft pulley. *kb
Known Recall Investigations
  • Extended braking distance investigation # EA18002

    On april 18, 2018, the office of defects investigation (odi) opened engineering analysis (ea) 18-002 to investigate reports of braking concerns in model year (my) 2006-12 ford fusion and lincoln mkz, and my 2006-11 mercury milan vehicles manufactured with continental automotive system’s abs hydraulic control units (hcus). Complainants report that after an abs braking event (initiated by slippery or uneven surfaces) the brake pedal moved towards the floor and the vehicle stopping distance increased beyond driver expectations.Inside the hcu are four hydraulic normally closed (nc) valves with zinc-coated moving armatures that control the flow of brake fluid. Unstable brake fluid can degrade over time, allow the brake fluid to gel, and corrosion to form on the armatures. The high-viscosity gelation and corrosion can cause the armatures to become stuck (open). In some cases, braking returns to normal when the armature(s) subsequently become unstuck. The intermittent condition proves difficult to diagnose with complainants reporting having (non-hcu) repairs conducted only to have the condition return.During the investigation, 14 hcus from complaint vehicles were recovered, including seven from reported crashes. Nhtsa’s vehicle research and test center (vrtc) disassembled the hcus, removed the four nc valves in each, and confirmed 22 of the 56 nc valves contained stuck armatures. On seven of the 14 hcus, both front wheel armatures were stuck, on nine of the 14 hcus two or three armatures were stuck. And 52 of the 56 nc armatures exhibited corrosion of the zinc coating. Forces required to extract stuck armatures from the valve sleeve were measured to range from 1.1 to 18.0 lbs. Vrtc also conducted abs braking tests on a variety of test surfaces that showed hcu failures cause increases in pedal travel and braking distances. Testing also showed that if the driver was able to apply four times the brake pedal force and two times the brake pedal travel, then high-vehicle decelerations could be achieved, however, single or multiple wheel lockups were also occurring.Based on ford’s response to odi’s july 20, 2018 information request letter, and complainants reports to nhtsa, odi identified a population of vehicles with an elevated level of field failure compared to vehicles produced both before and after.Further evaluation of ford’s response identified that the brake fluid used to produce these vehicles, a specific formulation of a dot3 fluid provided by cci corporation between february 2006 and july 2009, differed from the brake fluid used in other vehicle populations. Odi used the correlation of fluid specification and elevated field failures to identify a vehicle population exhibiting a defect trend. The complaints, crashes and injuries cited above, and the 14 recovered hcus involve vehicles from this population.On december 18, 2019, ford submitted safety recall (19v-904) to remedy hcu failures on the my 2006-2010 ford fusion, lincoln mkz, and mercury milan vehicles manufactured with the suspect cci brake fluid formulation. Ford will function test the hcu and replace the dot 3 brake fluid with an improved dot 4 brake fluid. If the hcu fails the function test, ford will install an hcu with a different armature coating (black oxide). Hcus with black oxide coating were fully phased into ford’s new vehicle production by my 2016; these hcus do not appear to be experiencing armature corrosion. Odi notes that the non-recalled ea18-002 subject vehicles, which were manufactured with a different specification brake fluid, did not display an elevated level of field failures like the recalled vehicles.Based on available information, ford’s recall addresses the unreasonable risk to motor safety. Accordingly, the investigation is closed. The odi reports cited above can be reviewed at nhtsa.Gov under the identification (odi) numbers found in the attached list.

  • Floor mat interference with accelerator investigation # EA12009

    On may 27, 2014, ford motor company submitted recall 14e-028 (ford recall #14s07) to correct a safety-related problem with certain drivers side ford optional all-weather floor mats sold for use in model year 2006 through 2011 model year ford fusion, mercury milan, lincoln zephyr, and lincoln mkz vehicles built at hermosillo assembly plant (hap) from november 9, 2007, to october 31 ,2010.Nhtsa testing determined that the original accessory all-weather mat with a single retention clip (figure 1), may interfere with accelerator pedal return to idle with the mat retained by the clip and rotated clockwise.Both the single- and double-clip (figure 2) all-weather floor mats may interfere with the accelerator pedal return to idle when the mats are not secured by the retention clip(s).Testing showed that this can occur if the mats are moved forward from the clipped position approximately two inches into a position in which the rear edge of the mats will abut the retention clip(s) when installed singly and align with the clip(s) when stacked on another floor mat.The pedal interference incidents reviewed by the office of defects investigation (odi) include 1 crash and 9 incidents with allegations of brake friction materials smoking and/or requiring repair for heat related damage.The crash incident occurred after the parking brake was applied at speed, resulting in loss-of-control vehicle yaw event caused by lock-up of the rear tires.The spin-out resulted in a side impact collision with an oncoming vehicle in an opposing lane of traffic. For the 29 incidents with sufficient information available to make an assessment; 23 (79%) were controlled by the driver either shifting to neutral, turning the engine off, or both; 4 (14%) were ended by the driver either kicking the pedal free (2) or pulling the mat away from the pedal (2); and 2 (7%) were ended by the pedal freeing itself from the mat with no apparent driver action.None of the drivers who reacted to the incident by shifting to neutral or turning the engine off reported any difficulties with either action.The subject mats were sold by ford and lincoln dealers directly to customers as an optional accessory equipment item or, beginning in november 2007, the mats were also available as a factory installed accessory if ordered with a new vehicle.Ford estimates that approximately 82,579 affected drivers side all weather floor mats were sold worldwide; either over the counter through ford dealerships or as original equipment.Owners that purchased the subject all-weather floor mats as a factory installed accessory with their new vehicle will be notified to return their all weather floor mats to their ford or lincoln dealership in exchange for replacement mats.Owners of all other potentially affected vehicles will be notified that, if they have an affected ford drivers side all weather floor mat, they should return their mats to the dealership in exchange for replacement mats.The voqs associated with the closing of this investigation are: 10327597, 10332233, 10334211, 10335336, 10339330, 10348772 (and duplicate 10342572), 10372674, 10379562, 10415911, 10426255, 10434107, 10521053, 10554966.This investigation is hereby closed.

  • Tire valve cracking investigation # PE08060

    On october 14, 2008, odi opened pe08-060 to investigate allegations of cracked and leaking snap-in tire valves in model year (my) 2007 vehicles manufactured by ford motor company.The valves were supplied to ford by topseal auto-parts, a subsidiary of the shanghai baolong automotive corporation in china.Valves made by topseal for aftermarket sale were the subject of two recent safety recalls by tech international (08t-018) and dill air controls (08t-028), the latter of which was investigated by odi in pe08-036 and ea08-022.The defect conditions addressed by the aftermarket tire valve recalls both involved inadequate resistance to ozone cracking due to issues with the supply of anti-ozonant chemicals to topseal for a period from july to mid-november 2006.The aftermarket valves were compounded with a blend of epdm and natural rubber, using a relatively low percentage of epdm (epdm provides inherent resistance to ozone cracking).Hence, the need for anti-ozonant chemicals and the problems with cracking when those chemicals were missing or out of specification in some lots of valves.Both recall campaigns involved inspection programs to identify and replace valves with visible surface cracking.Although the topseal valves supplied to ford also appear to have been affected by the anti-ozonant supply issues in mid to late-2006, ford indicated that its valves were made at a different topseal production line and were compounded with a higher percentage of epdm rubber to meet more stringent specifications from ford.Odis analysis of complaint and warranty data provided by ford showed that problems with cracked tire valves were significantly higher for my 2007 vehicles produced from december 2006 through march 2007.Ford responded by implementing changes in its material specifications for snap-in rubber tire valves and also increasing the quality and acceptance standards for valves imported for use in its vehicles.While the complaint and warranty claim rates are elevated for subject vehicles produced from december 2006 through march 2007, the rates of leaking valves are well below one percent of production for each of the peak months for all of the affected models.A substantial majority of the subject vehicles are equipped with tire pressure monitoring systems (tpms) which warn the driver when any tire pressures drops below 25 percent of recommended inflation pressure. As outlined in a letter to odi dated april 6, 2009, ford has agreed to send letters to owners of certain my 2007 and 2008 ford, lincoln and mercury vehicles to provide information about the cracking concern. Letters will be sent to owners of vehicles built from november 2006 through may 2007.Owners can opt for a free dealer inspection.Valves exhibiting surface cracks or air leakage related to ozone attack will be replaced by ford under its normal warranty terms.Ford expects to send the letter by approximately mid-may 2009. Based on the use of tpms in the majority of subject vehicles and the relatively low rates of repairs associated with leaking valves and resultant tire damage, odi believes that the actions ford has agreed to take will provide effective and expeditious resolution for vehicles that were built during the period when valves with inadequate resistance to ozone cracking were most likely to have been used in vehicle production.Further investigation of this matter would not be an efficient allocation of agency resources.Accordingly, this investigation is closed.The closing of this investigation does not constitute a finding by nhtsa that a safety-related defect does not exist.The agency will continue to

NHTSA decoded information from VIN

138 Results returned successfully. NOTE: Any missing decoded values should be interpreted as NHTSA does not have data on the specific variable. Missing value should NOT be interpreted as an indication that a feature or technology is unavailable for a vehicle.

Variable Value
Air Bag Loc CurtainAll Rows
Air Bag Loc Front1st Row (Driver and Passenger)
Air Bag Loc Side1st Row (Driver and Passenger)
Body ClassSedan/Saloon
DisplacementCC3000.0
DisplacementCI183.07123228419
DisplacementL3.0
Doors4
Engine ConfigurationV-Shaped
Engine Cylinders6
EngineHP210
EngineKW156.5970
Error Text0 - VIN decoded clean. Check Digit (9th position) is correct
Fuel Type PrimaryGasoline
MakeMERCURY
MakeID465
ManufacturerFORD MOTOR COMPANY, MEXICO
Manufacturer Id979
ModelMilan
ModelID1793
Model Year2007
NCSA Body Type4-door sedan, hardtop
NCSA MakeMercury
NCSA ModelMilan
Plant CityHERMOSILLO
Plant CountryMEXICO
Seat Belts AllManual
SeriesMilan
VIN3MEHM07157R623435
Vehicle TypePASSENGER CAR
Most Recent Consumer Complaints and Accidents
CrashFireTowedInjuredDeathsFailure
Date
NoNoN NoneNone20210715

Takata recall. The contact owns a 2007 mercury milan. The contact received a recall notification for nhtsa campaign number: 21v158000 (air bags) however, the part to do the recall repair was not yet available. The contact stated that the manufacturer had exceeded a reasonable amount of time for the recall repair. The manufacturer was notified of the issue. The contact had not experienced a failure. Vin tool confirms parts not available.

NoNoN NoneNone20210630

The contact's wife owns a 2007 mercury milan. The contact initially received a notification for nhtsa campaign number: 19v904000 (service brakes, hydraulic) however, the part to do the recall repair was unavailable. The contact then received a notice that the parts were available. The contact had taken the vehicle to the dealer for service however, soon after the repair, the contact experienced the failure. The contact stated that extended brake pedal travel was needed upon depression of brake pedal without warning. The contact had taken the vehicle back to the dealer where they informed him that they found no fault with the vehicle and could not help. The contact then took the vehicle to an independent mechanic who test drove the vehicle and agreed that the brake pedal was defective. The contact had taken the vehicle back to the dealer where two service mechanic had also test driven the vehicle and both confirmed that there was a defect with the brake pedal however, the contact would have to pay for a diagnostic. The manufacturer was notified of the failure and had offered no assistance. The vehicle was not repaired. The failure mileage was approximately 55,000.

NoNoN NoneNone20210514

The contact owns a 2007 mercury milan. The contact received notification of nhtsa campaign number: 19v904000 (service brakes, hydraulic) and had the vehicle serviced at a local dealer. Upon picking up the vehicle, the contact stated while stopping the vehicle, the brake pedal traveled to the floor. The contact stated that there was no warning light illuminated. The vehicle was taken back to the dealer but was not yet diagnosed. The vehicle was not repaired. The manufacturer was informed of the failure, and the contact filed a complaint. The failure mileage was approximately 160,089.

NoNoN NoneNone20210419

Ford just notified me that there is a safety recall notice 21s12 / nhtsa recall 21v-158 for the driver's side airbag. The answer to "what is the risk?" is: "if an airbag inflator explodes, sharp metal fragments could strike the driver or other occupants causing serious injury or death." and, yet, "ford has not issued instructions to stop driving your vehicle..." however, they do not have replacement parts yet for this vehicle at the mechanic shop that i have used for many years! My complaint is that i am now afraid to drive this car, my main source of transportation as a retiree widow. In addition, i am at a loss as to why this airbag was not replaced when the passenger side airbag in these vehicles was replaced back in 2018. I am just lucky that the airbag was not deployed when i had a front end collision in late 2012. I am asking that these parts be made available asap because frankly, i am disappointed in ford's response once again to this very serious situation. There is no longer any excuse for it.

NoNoN NoneNone20210418

Ford just notified me that there is a safety recall notice 21s12 / nhtsa recall 21v-158 for the driver's side airbag. The answer to "what is the risk?" is: "if an airbag inflator explodes, sharp metal fragments could strike the driver or other occupants causing serious injury or death." and, yet, "ford has not issued instructions to stop driving your vehicle..." however, they do not have replacement parts yet for this vehicle at the mechanic shop that i have used for many years! My complaint is that i am now afraid to drive this car, my main source of transportation as a retiree widow. In addition, i am at a loss as to why this airbag was not replaced when the passenger side airbag in these vehicles was replaced back in 2018. I am just lucky that the airbag was not deployed when i had a front end collision in late 2012. I am asking that these parts be made available asap because frankly, i am disappointed in ford's response once again to this very serious situation. There is no longer any excuse for it.

NoNoN NoneNone20210417

Manufacturer recall number19s54 nhtsa recall number19v904 list 12/2019 and still no remedy available

NoNoN NoneNone20210416

Manufacturer recall number19s54 nhtsa recall number19v904 list 12/2019 and still no remedy available

NoNoN NoneNone20210412

Tl* the contact owns a 2007 mercury milan. The contact received notifications of nhtsa campaign number: 21v158000 (air bags) and 19v904000 (service brakes, hydraulic) however, the parts to do the recall repairs were unavailable. The manufacturer was made aware of the issue. The contact stated that the manufacturer had exceeded a reasonable amount of time for the recall repairs. The contact had not experienced a failure. Vin tool confirms parts not available. Consumer stated still having issues with brakes and airbage light still is on.

NoNoN NoneNone20210411

Tl* the contact owns a 2007 mercury milan. The contact received notifications of nhtsa campaign number: 21v158000 (air bags) and 19v904000 (service brakes, hydraulic) however, the parts to do the recall repairs were unavailable. The manufacturer was made aware of the issue. The contact stated that the manufacturer had exceeded a reasonable amount of time for the recall repairs. The contact had not experienced a failure. Vin tool confirms parts not available.

Read and Submit Vehicle Complaints -- 63+ complaints filed
Common OBD-II Error Codes
  • P0351 [1] Ignition Coil A Primary/Secondary Circuit Malfunction
  • P0352 [1] Ignition Coil B Primary/Secondary Circuit Malfunction
  • P0353 [1] Ignition Coil C Primary/Secondary Circuit Malfunction
  • P0354 [1] Ignition Coil D Primary/Secondary Circuit Malfunction
  • P0355 [1] Ignition Coil E Primary/Secondary Circuit Malfunction
  • P2100 [1] Throttle Actuator "A" Control Motor Circuit/Open
  • P2110 [1] Throttle Actuator Control System - Forced Limited RPM
  • P0340 [1] Camshaft Position Sensor Circuit Malfunction (Bank 1)
Latest VINs Decoded for this Manufacturer
VIN Year Model Manufactured In
3MEHM07Z77R6043122007MilanHERMOSILLO , MEXICO
3MEHM07157R6234352007MilanHERMOSILLO , MEXICO
3MEHM07Z87R6437962007MilanHERMOSILLO , MEXICO
3MEHM07Z07R6066142007MilanHERMOSILLO , MEXICO
3MEHM08137R6488512007MilanHERMOSILLO , MEXICO
3MEHM07Z37R6439642007MilanHERMOSILLO , MEXICO
3MEHM08197R6198242007MilanHERMOSILLO , MEXICO
3MEHM02107R6719962007MilanHERMOSILLO , MEXICO
3MEHM07Z97R6718792007MilanHERMOSILLO , MEXICO
3MEHM07Z57R6153872007MilanHERMOSILLO , MEXICO
3MEHM08157R6586052007MilanHERMOSILLO , MEXICO
3MEHM08167R6550652007MilanHERMOSILLO , MEXICO
3MEHM07Z87R6023262007MilanHERMOSILLO , MEXICO
3MEHM07Z37R6632442007MilanHERMOSILLO , MEXICO
3MEHM07157R6069572007MilanHERMOSILLO , MEXICO
3MEHM02157R6649462007MilanHERMOSILLO , MEXICO

© dot.report 2024

Use of this information constitutes acceptance for use in an AS IS condition. There are NO warranties, implied or otherwise, with regard to this information or its use. Any use of this information is at the user's risk. It is the responsibility of user to evaluate the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any information, opinion, advice or other content. EACH USER WILL BE SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY consequences of his or her direct or indirect use of this web site. ALL WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND ARE EXPRESSLY DISCLAIMED. This site will NOT BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT or any other kind of loss.