Mercury Milan 2008
Vehicle Details: Recalls, Fuel Economy, Emissions, Investigations, Consumer Complaints, Decoded VIN Details, Service Bulletins
Below you will find all available information on the 2008 Mercury Milan.
The vehicle is described as a Front-Wheel Drive Midsize Cars 4-door sedan, hardtop.
Manufacturer | Known WMI(s) | Fuel Type |
---|---|---|
Mercury | Regular | |
City MPG | Highway MPG | CO2 emissions |
17 - 20 MPG | 25 - 29 MPG | 386.39 - 444.35 g/mile |
Use the box here to look up VINs from Mercury as well as other manufacturers
Sub-models: - Milan Awd -
-
What is the MPG of a 2008 Mercury Milan?
- The 2008 Mercury Milan has an EPA estimated city efficiency of 17 - 20 MPG and an estimated highway efficiency of 25 - 29 MPG.
-
What is the fuse box diagram for the 2008 Mercury Milan?
- Fuse box diagrams for the 2008 Mercury Milan can be found here
-
What is the annual fuel cost for the 2008 Mercury Milan?
- EPA estimated annual fuel cost for the 2008 Mercury Milan is $2350.
-
Where is the 2008 Mercury Milan produced?
- The 2008 Mercury Milan is produced in Hermosillo, Mexico.
-
Are there recalls for the 2008 Mercury Milan?
- There are 8 recall(s) for the 2008 Mercury Milan, additional information is below.
-
How much horsepower does the 2008 Mercury Milan have?
- The 2008 Mercury Milan has 210 horsepower.
Recall 229568 [USA]: An inflator explosion may result in sharp metal fragments striking the driver or other occupants, resulting in serious injury or death.
Recall 150548 [USA]: If the valves do not properly close, additional brake pedal travel may be required to stop the vehicle, increasing the risk of a crash.
Recall 120694 [USA]: An inflator rupture may result in metal fragments striking the vehicle occupants resulting in serious injury or death.
Recall 104395 [USA]: The floor mat could shift such that it could interfere with the accelerator pedal, preventing its return to an idle position, which could result in unintended vehicle speeds, increasing the risk of a crash.
Recall 2021029 [Canada]: Airbag
Recall 2019665 [Canada]: Brakes
Recall 2019005 [Canada]: Airbag
Recall 2016347 [Canada]: Airbag
To ensure accuracy and for your safety, it is recommended to do a free VIN recall check here or here [USA] - UK - Canada.
Automatic 5-spd Front-Wheel Drive Milan
Description Data Engine cylinders 4 Engine displacement in liters 2.3 Transmission Automatic 5-spd You save/spend over 5 years compared to an average car ($). savings are positive; a greater amount spent yields a negative number. for dual fuel vehicles, this is the cost savings for gasoline -2000 Transmission descriptor; for information see the fueleconomy.gov details CLKUP Description Data Annual petroleum consumption in barrels for fuel type 1 12.9352 City mpg for fuel type 1, 20 Combined mpg for fuel type 1, 23 Engine cylinders 4 Engine displacement in liters 2.3 Drive axle type Front-Wheel Drive Annual fuel cost for fuel type 1 ($) 2350 Fuel type with fuel type 1 and fuel type 2 (if applicable) Regular Fuel type 1. for single fuel vehicles, this will be the only fuel. for dual fuel vehicles, this will be the conventional fuel. Regular Gasoline Highway mpg for fuel type 1, 28 Vehicle record id 24377 4 door luggage volume (cubic feet) 16 Model name (carline) Milan Has my mpg data; see yourmpgvehicle and yourmpgdrivervehicle Y If true, this vehicle operates on a blend of gasoline and electricity in charge depleting mode false 4-door passenger volume (cubic feet) 101 Transmission Automatic 5-spd Unadjusted city mpg for fuel type 1 25.7209 Unadjusted highway mpg for fuel type 1 39.7273 EPA vehicle size class Midsize Cars You save/spend over 5 years compared to an average car ($). savings are positive; a greater amount spent yields a negative number. for dual fuel vehicles, this is the cost savings for gasoline -2000 Transmission descriptor; for information see the fueleconomy.gov details CLKUP Date the vehicle record was created (iso 8601 format) Tue Jan 01 00:00:00 EST 2013 Date the vehicle record was last modified (iso 8601 format) Tue Jan 01 00:00:00 EST 2013 Manual 5-spd Front-Wheel Drive Milan
Description Data Engine cylinders 4 Engine displacement in liters 2.3 Transmission Manual 5-spd You save/spend over 5 years compared to an average car ($). savings are positive; a greater amount spent yields a negative number. for dual fuel vehicles, this is the cost savings for gasoline -2000 Description Data Annual petroleum consumption in barrels for fuel type 1 12.9352 City mpg for fuel type 1, 20 Combined mpg for fuel type 1, 23 Engine cylinders 4 Engine displacement in liters 2.3 Drive axle type Front-Wheel Drive Annual fuel cost for fuel type 1 ($) 2350 Fuel type with fuel type 1 and fuel type 2 (if applicable) Regular Fuel type 1. for single fuel vehicles, this will be the only fuel. for dual fuel vehicles, this will be the conventional fuel. Regular Gasoline Highway mpg for fuel type 1, 29 Vehicle record id 24378 4 door luggage volume (cubic feet) 16 Model name (carline) Milan Has my mpg data; see yourmpgvehicle and yourmpgdrivervehicle N If true, this vehicle operates on a blend of gasoline and electricity in charge depleting mode false 4-door passenger volume (cubic feet) 101 Transmission Manual 5-spd Unadjusted city mpg for fuel type 1 25.8 Unadjusted highway mpg for fuel type 1 40.3 EPA vehicle size class Midsize Cars You save/spend over 5 years compared to an average car ($). savings are positive; a greater amount spent yields a negative number. for dual fuel vehicles, this is the cost savings for gasoline -2000 Date the vehicle record was created (iso 8601 format) Tue Jan 01 00:00:00 EST 2013 Date the vehicle record was last modified (iso 8601 format) Tue Jan 01 00:00:00 EST 2013 Automatic 6-spd Front-Wheel Drive Milan
Description Data Engine cylinders 6 Engine displacement in liters 3.0 Transmission Automatic 6-spd You save/spend over 5 years compared to an average car ($). savings are positive; a greater amount spent yields a negative number. for dual fuel vehicles, this is the cost savings for gasoline -3000 Transmission descriptor; for information see the fueleconomy.gov details CLKUP Description Data Annual petroleum consumption in barrels for fuel type 1 14.1671 City mpg for fuel type 1, 18 Combined mpg for fuel type 1, 21 Engine cylinders 6 Engine displacement in liters 3.0 Drive axle type Front-Wheel Drive Annual fuel cost for fuel type 1 ($) 2550 Fuel type with fuel type 1 and fuel type 2 (if applicable) Regular Fuel type 1. for single fuel vehicles, this will be the only fuel. for dual fuel vehicles, this will be the conventional fuel. Regular Gasoline Highway mpg for fuel type 1, 26 Vehicle record id 24379 4 door luggage volume (cubic feet) 16 Model name (carline) Milan Has my mpg data; see yourmpgvehicle and yourmpgdrivervehicle Y If true, this vehicle operates on a blend of gasoline and electricity in charge depleting mode false 4-door passenger volume (cubic feet) 101 Transmission Automatic 6-spd Unadjusted city mpg for fuel type 1 22.3 Unadjusted highway mpg for fuel type 1 36.1 EPA vehicle size class Midsize Cars You save/spend over 5 years compared to an average car ($). savings are positive; a greater amount spent yields a negative number. for dual fuel vehicles, this is the cost savings for gasoline -3000 Transmission descriptor; for information see the fueleconomy.gov details CLKUP Date the vehicle record was created (iso 8601 format) Tue Jan 01 00:00:00 EST 2013 Date the vehicle record was last modified (iso 8601 format) Tue Jan 01 00:00:00 EST 2013 Automatic 6-spd 4-Wheel or All-Wheel Drive Milan Awd
Description Data Engine cylinders 6 Engine displacement in liters 3.0 Transmission Automatic 6-spd You save/spend over 5 years compared to an average car ($). savings are positive; a greater amount spent yields a negative number. for dual fuel vehicles, this is the cost savings for gasoline -3750 Transmission descriptor; for information see the fueleconomy.gov details CLKUP Description Data Annual petroleum consumption in barrels for fuel type 1 14.8755 City mpg for fuel type 1, 17 Combined mpg for fuel type 1, 20 Engine cylinders 6 Engine displacement in liters 3.0 Drive axle type 4-Wheel or All-Wheel Drive Annual fuel cost for fuel type 1 ($) 2700 Fuel type with fuel type 1 and fuel type 2 (if applicable) Regular Fuel type 1. for single fuel vehicles, this will be the only fuel. for dual fuel vehicles, this will be the conventional fuel. Regular Gasoline Highway mpg for fuel type 1, 25 Vehicle record id 24380 4 door luggage volume (cubic feet) 16 Model name (carline) Milan Awd Has my mpg data; see yourmpgvehicle and yourmpgdrivervehicle N If true, this vehicle operates on a blend of gasoline and electricity in charge depleting mode false 4-door passenger volume (cubic feet) 101 Transmission Automatic 6-spd Unadjusted city mpg for fuel type 1 20.9284 Unadjusted highway mpg for fuel type 1 34.2287 EPA vehicle size class Midsize Cars You save/spend over 5 years compared to an average car ($). savings are positive; a greater amount spent yields a negative number. for dual fuel vehicles, this is the cost savings for gasoline -3750 Transmission descriptor; for information see the fueleconomy.gov details CLKUP Date the vehicle record was created (iso 8601 format) Tue Jan 01 00:00:00 EST 2013 Date the vehicle record was last modified (iso 8601 format) Tue Jan 01 00:00:00 EST 2013
Bulletins are notices put out by manufacturers in conjunction with the NHTSA to notify the public of manufacturing issues or changes.
- SSM 52476 - EQUIPMENT: All accessory stick-on keyless entry keypads come with a wallet card containing the master code. If the accessory keypad was factory installed, this card will be placed in the glove box and should be handed to the vehicles owner during ini
- SSM 52243 - ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING: When performing any transmission fluid change or topoff involving motorcrafta? Premium atf, mercona? V has replaced all versions of motorcrafta? Premium atf and can be used going forward. Mixing motorcrafta? Premium atf and mercona? V in th
- 22B05 S1 - AIR BAGS: Certain 2005-2014 mustang, 2005-2006 gt, 2004-2011 ranger, 2006-2012 fusion and mkz/zephyr, 2006-2011 milan, and 2007-2010 edge & mkx vehicles driver & passenger airbag module quality control inspection reason for this supplement ??A?A?
- 22B05 - AIR BAGS: Certain 2005-2014 mustang, 2005-2006 gt, 2004-2011 ranger, 2006-2012 fusion & mkz/zephyr, 2006-2011 milan, and 2007-2010 edge & mkx vehicles driver & passenger airbag module quality control inspection: ford motor company has determined that
- 21N11-S3 - SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC: Certain 2006-2010 model year fusion/milan/mkz/zephyr vehicles equipped with anti-lock brake systems dot 3 brake fluid and anti-lock brake system function in some of the affected vehicles, customers may return to the dealer with complaints
- 17B23-S1 - AIR BAGS: Certain 2006-2008 model year fusion and milan, 2006 zephyr, 2007-2008 mkz and 2007-2008 edge, mkx and ranger vehicles - driver airbag inflator replacement
- SSM 47009 - EQUIPMENT: The accessory (wireless) keyless entry keypad can only be used with vehicles that are factory built with remote keyless entry (rke). The master code for the accessory (wireless) keyless entry keypad can be retrieved from fmcdealer - parts a
- 17B23-S1 - AIR BAGS: Certain 2006-2008 model year fusion and milan, 2006 zephyr, 2007-2008 mkz and 2007-2008 edge, mkx and ranger vehicles - driver airbag inflator replacement
- SSM 47009 - EQUIPMENT:ELECTRICAL: The accessory (wireless) keyless entry keypad can only be used with vehicles that are factory built with remote keyless entry (rke). The master code for the accessory (wireless) keyless entry keypad can be retrieved from fmcdealer - parts a
- SSM 47201 - EQUIPMENT: Replacing the original equipment sync/navigation system with either an aftermarket sync/navigation kit or modifying original sync/navigation parts to provide additional features is not recommended nor supported on any ford, mercury or linco
- SSM 46085 - ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING:ENGINE:DIESEL: The powertrain control/emissions diagnosis (pc/ed) manual has been revised for diagnosing electronic throttle bodies (etbs). The etc_act and etc_dsd pids should not used to diagnose possible etb concerns. The ids has a limited refresh rate
- SSM 46332 - EQUIPMENT: Replacing the original equipment sync/navigation system with either an aftermarket sync/navigation kit or modifying original sync/navigation parts to provide additional features is not recommended nor supported on any ford, mercury or linco
- SSM 46132 - BRAKES (PWS): Some 2008-2017 ford/mercury/lincoln vehicles equipped with sync may generate a vhr that identifies a concern with the brakes and suspension category indicating service is required due to a brake system warning lamp being illuminated. If the
- SSM 46132 - BRAKES (PWS): Some 2008-2017 ford/mercury/lincoln vehicles equipped with sync may generate a vhr that identifies a concern with the brakes and suspension category indicating service is required due to a brake system warning lamp being illuminated. If the
- TSB-13-4-17 - POWER TRAIN:AUTOMATIC TRANSMISSION:CONTROL MODULE (TCM, PCM): Ford/lincoln/mercury: some vehicles, with diagnostic codes (dtcs) P0351, P0352, P0353, P0354, P0355, may experience a malfunction indicator lamp in the powertrain control module (pcm) and one or more coil on plug(s) damage. Models 2006-08
- TSB-12-8-1 - ELECTRICAL SYSTEM:12V/24V/48V BATTERY: Ford/lincoln/mercury: may have sludge buildup in throttle body leading to less airflow or engine idling rpm fluctuation and hard starts or battery disconnect or dead battery after keep alive memory (kam) clear. Models 2003-05 thunderbird
- 0713 - STEERING:HYDRAULIC POWER ASSIST:HOSE, PIPING, AND CONNECTIONS: Power steering fluid leaks from steering rack and pump attachment joints. *kb updated 2/27/08. *nj
Extended braking distance investigation # EA18002
There is no summary currently available
Floor mat interference with accelerator investigation # EA12009
On may 27, 2014, ford motor company submitted recall 14e-028 (ford recall #14s07) to correct a safety-related problem with certain drivers side ford optional all-weather floor mats sold for use in model year 2006 through 2011 model year ford fusion, mercury milan, lincoln zephyr, and lincoln mkz vehicles built at hermosillo assembly plant (hap) from november 9, 2007, to october 31 ,2010.Nhtsa testing determined that the original accessory all-weather mat with a single retention clip (figure 1), may interfere with accelerator pedal return to idle with the mat retained by the clip and rotated clockwise.Both the single- and double-clip (figure 2) all-weather floor mats may interfere with the accelerator pedal return to idle when the mats are not secured by the retention clip(s).Testing showed that this can occur if the mats are moved forward from the clipped position approximately two inches into a position in which the rear edge of the mats will abut the retention clip(s) when installed singly and align with the clip(s) when stacked on another floor mat.The pedal interference incidents reviewed by the office of defects investigation (odi) include 1 crash and 9 incidents with allegations of brake friction materials smoking and/or requiring repair for heat related damage.The crash incident occurred after the parking brake was applied at speed, resulting in loss-of-control vehicle yaw event caused by lock-up of the rear tires.The spin-out resulted in a side impact collision with an oncoming vehicle in an opposing lane of traffic. For the 29 incidents with sufficient information available to make an assessment; 23 (79%) were controlled by the driver either shifting to neutral, turning the engine off, or both; 4 (14%) were ended by the driver either kicking the pedal free (2) or pulling the mat away from the pedal (2); and 2 (7%) were ended by the pedal freeing itself from the mat with no apparent driver action.None of the drivers who reacted to the incident by shifting to neutral or turning the engine off reported any difficulties with either action.The subject mats were sold by ford and lincoln dealers directly to customers as an optional accessory equipment item or, beginning in november 2007, the mats were also available as a factory installed accessory if ordered with a new vehicle.Ford estimates that approximately 82,579 affected drivers side all weather floor mats were sold worldwide; either over the counter through ford dealerships or as original equipment.Owners that purchased the subject all-weather floor mats as a factory installed accessory with their new vehicle will be notified to return their all weather floor mats to their ford or lincoln dealership in exchange for replacement mats.Owners of all other potentially affected vehicles will be notified that, if they have an affected ford drivers side all weather floor mat, they should return their mats to the dealership in exchange for replacement mats.The voqs associated with the closing of this investigation are: 10327597, 10332233, 10334211, 10335336, 10339330, 10348772 (and duplicate 10342572), 10372674, 10379562, 10415911, 10426255, 10434107, 10521053, 10554966.This investigation is hereby closed.
Accel pedal interference - acc floormat investigation # PE10019
Unsecured mats may interfere with accelerator pedal return to idle. A heel blocker in the floor pan provides a platform that may lift an unsecured mat into contact with the pedal. Ford introduced new pedals as a running change early in model year (my) 2010 vehicles. Analysis of complaints received by odi and ford show elevated rates of pedal entrapment incidents in my 2008 through early 2010 production vehicles. Incidents typically occur following hard pedal applications to pass slower traffic or when merging into faster traffic. Drivers allege continued high engine power after releasing the accelerator pedal and difficulty braking, including reports that the incident was controlled by shifting to neutral or turning the engine off. Drivers and service technicians reference observing evidence of mat interference or note unsecured ford or aftermarket all weather floor mats in post-incident inspections.Based on information gathered during the preliminary evaluation the population being investigated has been narrowed to model years 2008 to 2010.This investigation has been upgraded to an engineering analysis on my 2008 through early-2010 vehicles (produced through september 2009) to further assess the scope, frequency and safety consequences of the alleged defect.The voqs associated with the opening of this engineering analysis are: 10479693, 10415911, 10379562, 10372674, 10345830, 10342572, 10339330, 10335336, 10334211, 10332233, 10331160, 10329659, 10327597, 10320011, 10232027, 10214131
Tire valve cracking investigation # PE08060
On october 14, 2008, odi opened pe08-060 to investigate allegations of cracked and leaking snap-in tire valves in model year (my) 2007 vehicles manufactured by ford motor company.The valves were supplied to ford by topseal auto-parts, a subsidiary of the shanghai baolong automotive corporation in china.Valves made by topseal for aftermarket sale were the subject of two recent safety recalls by tech international (08t-018) and dill air controls (08t-028), the latter of which was investigated by odi in pe08-036 and ea08-022.The defect conditions addressed by the aftermarket tire valve recalls both involved inadequate resistance to ozone cracking due to issues with the supply of anti-ozonant chemicals to topseal for a period from july to mid-november 2006.The aftermarket valves were compounded with a blend of epdm and natural rubber, using a relatively low percentage of epdm (epdm provides inherent resistance to ozone cracking).Hence, the need for anti-ozonant chemicals and the problems with cracking when those chemicals were missing or out of specification in some lots of valves.Both recall campaigns involved inspection programs to identify and replace valves with visible surface cracking.Although the topseal valves supplied to ford also appear to have been affected by the anti-ozonant supply issues in mid to late-2006, ford indicated that its valves were made at a different topseal production line and were compounded with a higher percentage of epdm rubber to meet more stringent specifications from ford.Odis analysis of complaint and warranty data provided by ford showed that problems with cracked tire valves were significantly higher for my 2007 vehicles produced from december 2006 through march 2007.Ford responded by implementing changes in its material specifications for snap-in rubber tire valves and also increasing the quality and acceptance standards for valves imported for use in its vehicles.While the complaint and warranty claim rates are elevated for subject vehicles produced from december 2006 through march 2007, the rates of leaking valves are well below one percent of production for each of the peak months for all of the affected models.A substantial majority of the subject vehicles are equipped with tire pressure monitoring systems (tpms) which warn the driver when any tire pressures drops below 25 percent of recommended inflation pressure. As outlined in a letter to odi dated april 6, 2009, ford has agreed to send letters to owners of certain my 2007 and 2008 ford, lincoln and mercury vehicles to provide information about the cracking concern. Letters will be sent to owners of vehicles built from november 2006 through may 2007.Owners can opt for a free dealer inspection.Valves exhibiting surface cracks or air leakage related to ozone attack will be replaced by ford under its normal warranty terms.Ford expects to send the letter by approximately mid-may 2009. Based on the use of tpms in the majority of subject vehicles and the relatively low rates of repairs associated with leaking valves and resultant tire damage, odi believes that the actions ford has agreed to take will provide effective and expeditious resolution for vehicles that were built during the period when valves with inadequate resistance to ozone cracking were most likely to have been used in vehicle production.Further investigation of this matter would not be an efficient allocation of agency resources.Accordingly, this investigation is closed.The closing of this investigation does not constitute a finding by nhtsa that a safety-related defect does not exist.The agency will continue to
138 Results returned successfully. NOTE: Any missing decoded values should be interpreted as NHTSA does not have data on the specific variable. Missing value should NOT be interpreted as an indication that a feature or technology is unavailable for a vehicle.
Variable | Value |
---|---|
Air Bag Loc Curtain | All Rows |
Air Bag Loc Front | 1st Row (Driver and Passenger) |
Air Bag Loc Side | 1st Row (Driver and Passenger) |
Body Class | Sedan/Saloon |
DisplacementCC | 3000.0 |
DisplacementCI | 183.07123228419 |
DisplacementL | 3.0 |
Doors | 4 |
Drive Type | AWD/All-Wheel Drive |
Engine Configuration | V-Shaped |
Engine Cylinders | 6 |
EngineHP | 210 |
EngineKW | 156.5970 |
Error Text | 0 - VIN decoded clean. Check Digit (9th position) is correct |
Fuel Type Primary | Gasoline |
Make | MERCURY |
MakeID | 465 |
Manufacturer | FORD MOTOR COMPANY, MEXICO |
Manufacturer Id | 979 |
Model | Milan |
ModelID | 1793 |
Model Year | 2008 |
NCSA Body Type | 4-door sedan, hardtop |
NCSA Make | Mercury |
NCSA Model | Milan |
Plant City | HERMOSILLO |
Plant Country | MEXICO |
Seat Belts All | Manual |
Series | V6 |
TPMS | Direct |
VIN | 3MEHM01168R600353 |
Vehicle Type | PASSENGER CAR |
Crash | Fire | Towed | Injured | Deaths | Failure Date |
---|
No | No | N | None | None | 20210623 |
Frame rail corrosion, noticed by dealer while having other recall service performed, they took photos since they hadn't seen this on a milan, fusion, or mkz. I am now concerned with the car's safety.
No | No | N | None | None | 20210518 |
2008 mercury milan. Consumer writes in regard to nhtsa safety recall 19v-904. The consumer requested to be reimbursed for repairs madeto the vehicles.
No | No | N | None | None | 20210517 |
I have been notified by ford motor company several times about the recalls on my vehicle. One recall is for airbags. I went to the closest dealership new my small town and thought they issued the fix, only to learn later that they just disconnect the airbag light. The second recall is for the brakes, i have been calling since january of 2021 to request a service date only to be told they have no knowledge of the recall. On march 30,2021 i finally got a service date and express to the representative on the phone to assure that she knew it was for the break recall 19s54, she assured me the knew. I took off work that morning for by service appointment only to be told that they did not have the equipment to fix the issue. I was told to call other dealerships and turned away. I called 4 surrounding dealerships with in a 50 mile radius only to be told no one can perform the procedure. I then called ford customer relationship center for assistance. She called one other dealership that said they could not fix the issue as well. April 2020 i receive a letter from ford motor company saying parts are now available to repair you vehicle. Called dealership 5/17/2021 they still cannot fix issue nor have any information on who can. Help! Ford motor company, how can i get the recalls fix if none of your dealerships in my area are capable of repairing them?
No | No | N | None | None | 20210423 |
Nhtsa recall number19v904 recall statusrecall incomplete, remedy not yet available summary on my vehicle, a valve in the hydraulic control unit of the anti-lock braking system may be stuck open. Took it to the north park lincoln dealer on 23 apr 2021 and they don't have the part for this recall. Said my inspection for this recall failed and they notified ford. It's been over 60 days and i am still waiting on this part. My car is not safe to drive as my brakes are very low and its taking longer to slow the car down so my car is basically not being used for fear that the brakes might go out. No one seems to be able to gove me an answer as to when this recalled part will be in. I received the recall letter from ford telliing me about this recall but letter also said the parts were available and that is why i took it to the dealer. Now im being told still on backorder no idea when part will be received. This causes a problem for me if i can't really use this car because of the safety risk this may result in extended brake pedal travel required to stop the vehicle, increasing the risk of a crash. There are no warning lights yet displayed.
No | No | N | None | None | 20210420 |
Tl* the contact owns a 2008 mercury milan. The contact received notification of nhtsa campaign number: 19v904000 (service brakes, hydraulic) however, the part to do the recall repair was unavailable. Steven's 112 ford (507 ny-112, east patchogue, ny 11772) was contacted and it was confirmed that the part was not yet available. The contact stated that the manufacturer exceeded a reasonable amount of time for the recall repair. The manufacturer was made aware of the issue and referred the contact to a local dealer. The contact had not experienced a failure. Vin tool confirms parts not available.
No | No | N | None | None | 20210419 |
Tl* the contact owns a 2008 mercury milan. The contact received notification of nhtsa campaign number: 19v904000 (service brakes, hydraulic) however, the part to do the recall repair was unavailable. Steven's 112 ford (507 ny-112, east patchogue, ny 11772) was contacted and it was confirmed that the part was not yet available. The contact stated that the manufacturer exceeded a reasonable amount of time for the recall repair. The manufacturer was made aware of the issue and referred the contact to a local dealer. The contact had not experienced a failure. Vin tool confirms parts not available.
Crash | No | Y | 1 Injured | None | 20210405 |
The contact owns a 2008 mercury milan. The contact stated while driving 15 mph and approaching a traffic light, when depressing the brake pedal to the floor but failed to stop. The contact stated no warning light was illuminated. The contact stated he crashed into the curb and bent the front passenger side rim which blew out the tire causing the vehicle to be able to come to a stop. The contact stated the vehicle came to a stop. The air bags did not deploy. The contact stated he sustained injuries on both knees and his chest. The contact did not seek medical attention. A police report was not filed. The vehicle was not drivable. The contacts uncle towed the vehicle to the uncle's residence. The contact was able to replace both front driver and passenger tires, the front passenger side rim, and the motor mount. A dealer was not contacted. The vehicle was not diagnosed. The contact, later on, received notification of nhtsa campaign numbers: 19v904000 (service brakes, hydraulic) and 21v158000 (air bags), however, the part to the recall was unavailable. The contact stated that the manufacturer exceeded a reasonable amount of time for the recall repair. The manufacturer was made aware of the failure. The failure mileage was approximately 169,000. Vin tool confirms part not available. Consumer stated vehicle has not been repaired. * (recall related incident) ts
No | No | N | None | None | 20210122 |
I received a recall notice in january 2000 recall #19s54/nhtsa recall 19-904. I have called numerous times to have this recall corrected on my car and i called again this week january 2001and they still do not have the parts to correct the problem, in think this to long they tell me another 3 months before they can fix the problem. They did tell me they could fix it however i would need to pay for it. I feel waiting a year and 3 months to correct this problem is unheard of. I have over $800. That i have already paid to correct the problem. My brake pedal and gas pedal are the same position and need to be very careful driving this car what ever help you can give me is welcomed [xxx] information redacted pursuant to the freedom of information act (foia), 5 u.S.C. 552(b)(6). *tr
No | No | N | None | None | 20210121 |
I received a recall notice in january 2000 recall #19s54/nhtsa recall 19-904. I have called numerous times to have this recall corrected on my car and i called again this week january 2001and they still do not have the parts to correct the problem, in think this to long they tell me another 3 months before they can fix the problem. They did tell me they could fix it however i would need to pay for it. I feel waiting a year and 3 months to correct this problem is unheard of. I have over $800. That i have already paid to correct the problem. My brake pedal and gas pedal are the same position and need to be very careful driving this car what ever help you can give me is welcomed [xxx] information redacted pursuant to the freedom of information act (foia), 5 u.S.C. 552(b)(6). *tr
Common OBD-II Error Codes
- P0351 [1] Ignition Coil A Primary/Secondary Circuit Malfunction
- P0352 [1] Ignition Coil B Primary/Secondary Circuit Malfunction
- P0353 [1] Ignition Coil C Primary/Secondary Circuit Malfunction
- P0354 [1] Ignition Coil D Primary/Secondary Circuit Malfunction
- P0355 [1] Ignition Coil E Primary/Secondary Circuit Malfunction
VIN | Year | Model | Manufactured In |
---|---|---|---|
3MEHM08168R653303 | 2008 | Milan | HERMOSILLO , MEXICO |
3MEHM08ZX8R629771 | 2008 | Milan | HERMOSILLO , MEXICO |
3MEHM01168R600353 | 2008 | Milan | HERMOSILLO , MEXICO |
3MEHM07158R621203 | 2008 | Milan | HERMOSILLO , MEXICO |
3MEHM081X8R641591 | 2008 | Milan | HERMOSILLO , MEXICO |
3MEHM07Z48R618525 | 2008 | Milan | HERMOSILLO , MEXICO |
3MEHM08Z38R662949 | 2008 | Milan | HERMOSILLO , MEXICO |
3MEHM07ZX8R630369 | 2008 | Milan | HERMOSILLO , MEXICO |
3MEHM07Z38R642749 | 2008 | Milan | HERMOSILLO , MEXICO |
3MEHM07Z08R665714 | 2008 | Milan | HERMOSILLO , MEXICO |
3MEHM07Z18R651854 | 2008 | Milan | HERMOSILLO , MEXICO |
3MEHM08Z08R666358 | 2008 | Milan | HERMOSILLO , MEXICO |