Nissan Nv200 2018

• Recall 151850 [USA]: The lack of an image in the back-up camera display increases the risk of a crash.
  Nissan north america, inc. (nissan) is recalling certain 2018-2019 nissan altima, armada, frontier, kicks, leaf, maxima, murano, nv, nv200, pathfinder, rogue, rogue sport, sentra, titan, titan diesel, versa note and versa sedan vehicles, as well as infiniti q50, q60, qx30 and qx80 vehicles. Additionally included are 2019 nissan gt-r and taxi and infiniti qx50, qx60, q70, q70l vehicles. The back-up camera and display settings can be adjusted such that the rear view image is no longer visible and the system will retain that setting the next time the vehicle is placed in reverse. As such, these vehicles fail to comply with the requirements of federal motor vehicle safety standard (fmvss) number 111, "rear visibility."
  nissan will notify owners in phases, having dealers update the back-up camera settings software, free of charge. The recall began november 11, 2019 and all affected vins should be activated. Owners may contact nissan customer service at 1-800-867-7669 or infiniti customer service at 1-800-662-6200.
  owners may also contact the national highway traffic safety administration vehicle safety hotline at 1-888-327-4236 (tty 1-800-424-9153), or go to www.Safercar.Gov.

  Show Content

• Recall 2019459 [Canada]: Visual system
  Issue: on certain vehicles, the rear view camera system does not return to the default setting when the transmission is shifted to reverse. This could cause a reduction in rear visibility if a driver had previously adjusted the camera display. Canadian regulations require that the rear view image returns to its original setting each time the camera is turned on. Safety risk: reduced rear visibility could increase the risk of a crash. Corrective actions: the company will notify owners by mail and instruct them to take their vehicle to a dealer to update the software for the rear view camera.

  Show Content

To ensure accuracy and for your safety, it is recommended to do a free VIN recall check here or here [USA] - UK - Canada.

Bulletins are notices put out by manufacturers in conjunction with the NHTSA to notify the public of manufacturing issues or changes.

• Desiccated air bag inflator rupture investigation # EA21002

  From 2000 through 2017, takata produced millions of air bag inflators using two types of phase-stabilized ammonium nitrate ("psan") propellant -- propellant 2004 and propellant 2004l. After prolonged exposure to high temperature cycles and humidity, inflators using propellant 2004 can degrade, causing the propellant to burn too quickly when ignited. The rapid burning can cause the inflator to rupture during deployment, potentially causing serious or even fatal injury to vehicle occupants. See 2016 blomquist report at www.Nhtsa.Gov/sites/nhtsa.Gov/files/documents/expert_report-hrblomquist.Pdf.Consequently, all frontal inflators using propellant 2004 that do not contain a "desiccant" (a substance that traps and holds moisture) in us vehicles are under recall. These "non-desiccated" inflators either have been or are required to be replaced.In some cases, the remedy part for these recalled inflators was, or will be, an inflator using either propellant 2004 or 2004l that does contain a desiccant. None of these "desiccated" remedy parts (which were installed in older model year vehicles) are currently under recall for a degradation concern. Certain subsets of desiccated psan inflators using propellant 2004 for use as original equipment, however, have been recalled for a degradation concern. All takata inflators produced with propellant 2004l contain desiccant, and none of these desiccated inflators using propellant 2004l are under recall for a degradation concern. There have been no reported field ruptures in any non-recalled desiccated psan inflators.It is understood that desiccants fully saturate at some threshold, at which point any additional moisture will not be captured. This means the degradation process observed in non-desiccated inflators using propellant 2004 may also occur in non-recalled desiccated inflators using propellant 2004, assuming additional moisture enters the inflator and high temperature cycling occurs. Based on available information, desiccant saturation can occur within the first five years in the worst environments, and the time required for full saturation is affected by multiple factors. While no present safety risk has been identified, further work is needed to evaluate the future risk of non-recalled desiccated inflators using propellant 2004.Three entities -- takata (now known as tk global), the independent testing coalition, and exponent -- have been studying the long-term behavior of takata desiccated psan inflators using propellant 2004l (as well as 2004) in the presence of moisture and temperature cycling. The research efforts, which include development of predictive modeling techniques and field sample analysis, are ongoing. To date, none of the researchers have identified field evidence showing that propellant 2004l is undergoing a degradation process that leads to aggressive deployment and potential rupture. However, the time in service of such inflators remains short compared to that of the inflators using propellant 2004. Further study is needed to assess the long-term safety of desiccated inflators using propellant 2004l.The office of defects investigation is opening this investigation to examine whether a safety defect related to propellant degradation exists in non-recalled desiccated psan frontal inflators manufactured by takata. This investigation will require extensive information on takata production processes and surveys of inflators in the field. Lists of recall actions that may have used desiccated psan inflators as remedy parts, as well as the makes and models originally manufactured with them, is available with the downloadable version of this document (see nhtsa.Gov/recalls?Nhtsaid=ea21002 -- note this information is subject to change/revision as the investigation proceeds). This investigation does not supersede ea15-001, which remains open.
  

  Show Content

Our company has a 2018 nv 200, a commercial vehicle with 100,000 mile bumper-to-bumper commercial nissan warranty. There are about 58,000 miles on the truck. On january, 26, 2021 while driving on a small residential road at 5 miles an hour, the passenger side curtain deployed. The truck did not hit anything at all. Our technician said it sounded like a gun went off. He couldn't see anything. Had this happened on the highway, he certainly would've been in an accident, possibly fatal. I have been trying to work with nissan to have them simply give us a loaner truck for the eight weeks that will be required in order to do a thorough investigation. I'm not trying to cause them trouble but they told me i am responsible for the cost of any loaner truck!!!!!!!. This is the worst handling of a highly explosive situation (no pun intended) that i can imagine. They also said it's up to their discretion to decide if i would get reimbursed. Furthermore, they said i may be subject to storage charges at the local dealer until this is settled. Is this incredible? Dakota from their arbitration group has been assigned to me. No person could have less skills given the severity of this incident. I asked for just two things: a loaner truck and commitment to make sure that any defects be not hidden from the public. Disgraceful. Who is safe in their vehicles????? Here's the worst part. When i told them i demanded a loaner vehicle, they said the case was closed!!!!!, mr/mrs dakota called the dealer and told them the case was closed and settled. They want to bury it. Someone could have been killed

Our company has a 2018 nv 200, a commercial vehicle with 100,000 mile bumper-to-bumper commercial nissan warranty. There are about 58,000 miles on the truck. On january, 26, 2021 while driving on a small residential road at 5 miles an hour, the passenger side curtain deployed. The truck did not hit anything at all. Our technician said it sounded like a gun went off. He couldn't see anything. Had this happened on the highway, he certainly would've been in an accident, possibly fatal. I have been trying to work with nissan to have them simply give us a loaner truck for the eight weeks that will be required in order to do a thorough investigation. I'm not trying to cause them trouble but they told me i am responsible for the cost of any loaner truck!!!!!!!. This is the worst handling of a highly explosive situation (no pun intended) that i can imagine. They also said it's up to their discretion to decide if i would get reimbursed. Furthermore, they said i may be subject to storage charges at the local dealer until this is settled. Is this incredible? Dakota from their arbitration group has been assigned to me. No person could have less skills given the severity of this incident. I asked for just two things: a loaner truck and commitment to make sure that any defects be not hidden from the public. Disgraceful. Who is safe in their vehicles????? Here's the worst part. When i told them i demanded a loaner vehicle, they said the case was closed!!!!!, mr/mrs dakota called the dealer and told them the case was closed and settled. They want to bury it. Someone could have been killed

Tl* the contact owns a 2018 nissan nv200. The contact stated while he was reversing the vehicle, the rear view camera imagine was blinking on and off, causing his rear bumper to impact a hill. The contact stated the bumper was dislocated. The contact stated no warning light was illuminated. The air bags did not deploy. No police report was filed. The contact vin was associated to nhtsa campaign number: 19v654000 (back over prevention). The vehicle was taken to local dealer central valley nissan located at 4530 mchenry ave, modesto, ca 95356, (209) 526-3320, was made aware of the recall. The vehicle had not been repaired as of yet. The manufacturer had not been informed of failure. The failure mileage was 29,000.

Tl* the contact owns a 2018 nissan nv200. The contact stated while he was reversing the vehicle, the rear view camera imagine was blinking on and off, causing his rear bumper to impact a hill. The contact stated the bumper was dislocated. The contact stated no warning light was illuminated. The air bags did not deploy. No police report was filed. The contact vin was associated to nhtsa campaign number: 19v654000 (back over prevention). The vehicle was taken to local dealer central valley nissan located at 4530 mchenry ave, modesto, ca 95356, (209) 526-3320, was made aware of the recall. The vehicle had not been repaired as of yet. The manufacturer had not been informed of failure. The failure mileage was 29,000.

Common OBD-II Error Codes

• B00A0 [4] Occupant Classification System (Subfault)
• P2813 [4] Pressure Control Solenoid "G" Control Circuit Range/Performance
• P0841 [4] Transmission Fluid Pressure Sensor/Switch "A" Circuit Range/Performance
• P0776 [5] Pressure Control Solenoid B Performance or Stuck Off
• P1715 [5] PNP Switch Out Of Self Test Range
• P17F0 [4] P17F0
• P17F1 [4] P17F1
• P0456 [4] Evaporative Emissions System Small Leak Detected
• P0442 [2] Evaporative Emission Control System Leak Detected (small leak)
• P0455 [2] Evaporative Emission Control System Leak Detected (gross leak)
• P0603 [2] Internal Control Module Keep Alive Memory (KAM) Error
• P0101 [1] Mass or Volume Air Flow "A" Circuit Range/Performance Problem